Damn, I'm in the middle (well, in the first 25%) of a test of my new statsreader tool and thus it'll take some time until i can test that filter (and I'll do then, for sure!). But it _sounds_ good. The theory behind is still interesting for me, though! Thanks again for your work, best regards, Koepi
Right now I run temporalsmoother through MAM to keep it from producing weird stuff at fadein/outs and other motion. Would this be close to what your motion temporal smoother does or am I way off? Whenever I get the chance I'll give it a test. I've just finished running some tests with C3D and it's time for me to get to bed. Peace, SoulFX
Hi Donald, It sounds promising. The motion detection work well : 50 was not enought to catch all moving object but when I lower the treshold to 25 I can almost see no ghosting (in fact a little one but my sources is very strange). My test source is very noisy and the filter even with strength 5 don't smooth enought. Just a funny thing : the filter goes crazy when you go backward in Vdub ;) Good work.
Thank you, Gentlemen. There is much scope for improvement, in both the artifacts and the speed. Watch here for further versions. Yes, I'd already concluded that strength 5 was too low and had increased it to 7. What do you think is a reasonable maximum?
I also got some artifacts, they appeared at all strengths (2-5). The ones I noticed were in high motion scenes so they could not be seen during normal playback.
--------------------- Никто в этом мире не сделает меня более счастливым и успешным, кроме меня самого.