Low Latency Monitoring = No Verb?? >>
FORUM lowesmall.shop

FORUM lowesmall.shop



SearchSearch   Users   Registration   Entrance
Today: 17.09.2025 - 20:49:21
Pages:  1  

Low Latency Monitoring = No Verb??

AuthorMessage

Tom Sederburg

main user




Statistics:
Messages: 2,729
Registration: 11.10.2001

How does everyone deal with the lack of sends / plugins, while in LLM I'd rather have a little latency with the benefit of Verb than a DRY vocal...(uninspired) Most pro singers hate latency though...What's the work around??

---------------------
Message # 1 07.12.23 - 16:34:41
RE: Low Latency Monitoring = No Verb??

kotsos1870

main user




Statistics:
Messages: 851
Registration: 03.18.2003

Use an external mixer with some FX hooked up for monitoring.

---------------------
Message # 2 07.12.23 - 16:39:19
RE: Low Latency Monitoring = No Verb??

Yonkers320is

main user




Statistics:
Messages: 3,286
Registration: 02.06.2003

There is a work around.. as I showed a while ago in . Take a cable and feed it out of output 3 and mult it back into inputs 3 & 4. Rail

---------------------
Message # 3 07.12.23 - 16:50:50
RE: Low Latency Monitoring = No Verb??

D_ALPINE_M

main user




Statistics:
Messages: 4,078
Registration: 10.27.2002

I tryed the insert 3 out trick, but it appears to null the output of the voc track to the 2bus... I guess I could use the mix on the verb plug

---------------------
WHO WANNA BATTLE
Message # 4 07.12.23 - 16:59:01
RE: Low Latency Monitoring = No Verb??

Jyep

main user




Statistics:
Messages: 360
Registration: 09.06.2003

Use the reverb plug-in on the master fader, it doesn't affect LLM. Andi

---------------------
Message # 5 07.12.23 - 17:09:36
RE: Low Latency Monitoring = No Verb??

badboybarge

main user




Statistics:
Messages: 473
Registration: 12.17.2002

You don't need low latency monitoring while mixing. Turn it off when you mix. And you certainly don't need any plug-ins while recording. In fact, it is absolutely pointless to use plug-ins while recording because it doesn't affect the sound to tape anyway. And don't tell me that your singer must have their reverb while tracking. That's just silly. So what's the problem?

---------------------
barge (big thanks to amibuggnu for this!)
Message # 6 07.12.23 - 17:20:56
RE: Low Latency Monitoring = No Verb??

Anetsberger

main user




Statistics:
Messages: 327
Registration: 01.14.2002

ajderrick It's been a long time since I posted that.. but if you mult the send from output 3 back to inputs 3 and 4 it should work. Rail

---------------------
Bayerische Motoren Werke - "Motor is our middle name." 1995 E36 325is - M50 / M3 ZF 5spd. w/3.23 LSD 1991 E30 318is - M42 / 5spd. Sold. 2/08
Message # 7 07.12.23 - 17:27:06
RE: Low Latency Monitoring = No Verb??

91-e30-318is

main user




Statistics:
Messages: 160
Registration: 02.23.2003

YOU tell a major label recording artist, reverb on his / her vocal is silly. You won't be working long...

---------------------
'91 E30 318is - Dinan chip, K&N cone intake, GC coilovers/camber plates, Koni shocks, ST sway bars, Supersprint exhaust. '95 E36 M3 - cosmos intake, 3.5" HFM, 24 lb. injectors, Vorshlag AST 5100 coilovers/camber plates, TMS sway bars, UUC exhaust.
Message # 8 07.12.23 - 17:37:34
RE: Low Latency Monitoring = No Verb??
Small codec pack - what should I add? : Previous topicNext topic: to turn off 002 or not to turn off 002? that is the question
Pages:  1  

Message
Name
Message

Click on the dot next to the name to address the participant

           
   
The administrator has prohibited guests from replying to messages! To register, follow the link: register


Participants